Main Article Content

Abstract

We present findings from a mixed-methods study of undergraduates’ attitudes toward written communication in their third academic year at the University of Sri Jayewardenepura’s Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce (FMSC). The undergraduates in the Department of Commerce were asked to complete an online survey on their attitudes about mastering writing. The research method was descriptive. After analyzing the theoretical underpinnings of attitudes and writing, a survey was created, piloted, and given to 25 randomly chosen third-year FMSC undergraduates. Only 22 of the sample members answered every query. To find out why the 22 participants desired to learn writing in the FMSC, a questionnaire with 10 closed-ended questions was sent, and a series of in-depth, semi-structured interviews with all 22 participants was conducted. The findings indicate that the majority (92%) of the participants need to improve their speaking skills not their writing skills in the university. Many (95.5%) valued it as a basic requirement to pursue their higher education in the future. There was a considerable level of preference (90%) to master English writing skills online than practising it in the physical classroom. However, only 19% of the participants mentioned that they have more than three hours a week to practise writing skills. Findings further indicated that about 20% of the sample never use library resources. The above findings may be helpful in designing English writing courses for undergraduates in the Departments of Commerce in Sri Lankan universities.

Keywords

Academic Writing Undergraduates Commerce Curriculum Design

Article Details

How to Cite
Dharmawardene, R. P., Wijewardene, L., & Kaviratne, I. (2023). Enhancing Writing Skills of the Undergraduates: Implications for Curriculum Design in Sri Lankan context. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Research, 11(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.53075/Ijmsirq/6468764

References

  1. Aduba, D. E., & Mayowa-Adebara, O. (2022). Online platforms used for teaching and learning during the COVID-19 era: The case of LIS students in Delta State University, Abraka. International Information & Library Review, 54(1), 17-31.
  2. Atinmo, M., & Isiaka Amusa, O. (2016). Availability, level of use and constraints to use of electronic resources by law lecturers in public universities in Nigeria. Availability, Level of use and Constraints to use of Electronic Resources by Law Lecturers in Public Universities in Nigeria, 139-172.
  3. Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT journal, 54(2), 153-160.
  4. Dalem, M. (2010). Difficulties in Academic Writing.
  5. Dharmawardene, R. P., & Wijewardene, L. (2022). Teaching English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level in Sri Lanka: A Needs Analysis Approach. European Journal of Science, Innovation and Technology, 2(4), 60-70.
  6. Fitria, T. N. (2020). Teaching English through online learning system during Covid-19 pandemic. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 24-37.
  7. Grami, G. M. A. (2010). The effects of integrating peer feedback into university-level ESL writing curriculum: A comparative study in a Saudi context Newcastle University].
  8. Hinkel, E. (2003). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Routledge.
  9. Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148-164.
  10. Kay, H., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1998). Genre: What teachers think.
  11. Kisworo, A., Restuaji, T., Nuriana, R., & Mei Lina, F. (2023). Education and ICT amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Teaching reflections of Indonesian educators. In Research and Teaching in a Pandemic World: The Challenges of Establishing Academic Identities During Times of Crisis (pp. 509-525). Springer.
  12. Mendis, D., & Rambukwella, H. (2020). Sri Lankan Englishes. In The Routledge handbook of world Englishes (pp. 178-193). Routledge.
  13. Pennycook, A. (2006). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. Routledge.
  14. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Howard, S. K., & Tondeur, J. (2023). The more experienced, the better prepared? New evidence on the relation between teachers’ experience and their readiness for online teaching and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107530.
  15. Sukmawati, S., Sujarwo, S., Soepriadi, D. N., & Amaliah, N. (2022). Online English Language teaching in the midst of Covid-19 Pandemic: Non EFL students' feedback and Response. Al-Ta lim Journal, 29(1), 62-69.
  16. Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (Vol. 1). University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor, MI.
  17. Yan, G. (2005). A process genre model for teaching writing. English teaching forum,