Main Article Content


Efficiently navigating bureaucracy is crucial for the success of any organization. Failing to do so can severely hinder an organization's core functionality. This review examines how bureaucracy can positively or negatively impact organizational performance. Our findings emphasize the critical role bureaucracy plays in determining the success of a business, as it significantly affects efficiency, innovation, and overall effectiveness. Organizational structures are meant to make things easier, but they can slow things down when there are too many bureaucratic hurdles. In fact, excessive red tape can make it difficult for an organization to be as agile and responsive as it needs to be. For organizations to be more effective, it is important to take a hard look at the current processes and see where you can streamline things and eliminate unnecessary bureaucracies. The review explores the nuanced relationship between bureaucracy and employee morale, creativity, and job satisfaction, highlighting the importance of balancing structure with progress. Drawing insights from existing literature, this paper has unraveled the complexities of the effect of bureaucracy on organizational dynamics. The review has suggested strategies to mitigate negative impacts and optimize bureaucratic frameworks for enhanced organizational performance. Ultimately, this exploration seeks to provide valuable perspectives for organizational leaders, policymakers, and scholars in creating environments that thrive amidst bureaucratic challenges.


Bureaucracy organization structure Performance-Based Rewards Ghana

Article Details

How to Cite
Osie Bonsu, C. (2024). The Effects of Bureaucracy on Organizational Performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Research, 12(2), 1795–1802.


  1. Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2005). External constraints on local service standards: The case of comprehensive performance assessment in English local government. Public Administration, 83 (3), 639-656.
  2. Bennis, W. G. (1966). Changing organizations: Essays on the development and evolution of human organization. McGraw-Hill.
  3. Cordella, A. (2007). E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form? Journal of Information Technology, 22 (3), 265-274.
  4. Crozier, M. (1964). The bureaucratic phenomenon. University of Chicago Press.
  5. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147-160.
  6. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21 (4), 1022-1054.
  7. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49 (2), 149-164.
  8. Henig, J. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton University Press.
  9. Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20 (2-3), 93-109.
  10. Kingsley, J. D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy: An interpretation of the British civil service. Indiana University Press.
  11. Krislov, S. (1974). Representative bureaucracy. Prentice-Hall.
  12. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. Free Press.
  13. Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2001). Structure and discretion: Missing links in representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11 (4), 455-470.
  14. Meier, K. J., Polinard, J. L., & Wrinkle, R. D. (2000). Bureaucracy and organizational performance: Causality arguments about public schools. American Journal of Political Science, 44 (3), 590-602.
  15. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 340-363.
  16. Merton, R. K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18 (4), 560-568.
  17. Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Aldine-Atherton.
  18. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 145-179.
  19. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley.
  20. Paris, D. C. (1995). The politics of school choice. Rowman & Littlefield.
  21. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford University Press.
  22. Rainey, H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10 (2), 447-470.
  23. Riccucci, N. M. (2002). Managing diversity in public sector workforces. Westview Press.
  24. Richard, P.J., Devinney, T.M., Yip, G.S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35 (3), 718-804.
  25. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage.
  26. Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. University of Chicago Press.
  27. Selden, S. C. (1997). The promise of representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. M.E. Sharpe.
  28. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Harper & Row.
  29. Smith, K. B., & Meier, K. J. (1995). The case against school choice: Politics, markets, and fools. M.E. Sharpe.
  30. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill.
  31. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Free Press.
  32. Witte, J. F. (1992). Private school versus public school achievement: Are there findings that should affect the educational choice debate? Economics of Education Review, 11 (4), 371-394.
  33. Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13 (1), 443-464.