Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the efficacy of performance appraisal systems (PAS) in educational institutions, with a focus on the Jaman North District of Ghana. Performance appraisal systems are critical in enhancing job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and overall educational quality. Despite their importance, many educational institutions struggle with effective implementation due to challenges such as bias, lack of standardized criteria, and insufficient training. This research employs a descriptive case study design, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data collected from 145 staff members of second-cycle public institutions, including teachers, headmasters, and circuit supervisors. The findings reveal that a significant proportion of respondents (59.3%) have undergone performance appraisals. However, a majority (88.3%) reported not receiving formal training prior to their first appraisal, indicating a critical gap that undermines the effectiveness of PAS. The study also highlights the benefits of a mixed-method approach, with logistic regression analysis showing that respondents who experienced both qualitative and quantitative appraisals were significantly more likely to have undergone performance evaluations. Despite these benefits, there is considerable skepticism among respondents about the fairness and motivational impact of the appraisal system, as reflected in the lower mean scores for statements regarding its role in performance improvement and employee motivation. The research aligns with existing literature emphasizing the need for comprehensive PAS that incorporate both qualitative and quantitative measures. It underscores the importance of adequate training for appraisers to ensure transparency and fairness. The demographic data of the respondents, predominantly male with high educational qualifications and significant professional experience, further support the potential effectiveness of PAS if implemented correctly. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the current state and challenges of PAS in the Jaman North District. It calls for targeted interventions to address training gaps and enhance the perceived fairness and effectiveness of performance appraisals. These improvements are essential for leveraging PAS to achieve higher job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and educational quality in Ghanaian educational institutions.

Keywords

Performance Appraisal Systems (PAS) Educational Institutions Job Satisfaction Organizational Commitment

Article Details

How to Cite
Osman, A., Kyeraa, A., & Opoku, V. (2024). The Efficacy of Performance Appraisal Systems in Educational Institutions: Insights from the Jaman North District of Ghana. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Research, 12(4), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.53075/Ijmsirq/09873656546754

References

  1. Adams, S. J., & Neumark, D. (2019). Performance appraisal and professional development in higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(5), 718-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218775181
  2. Bryson, J., Ackermann, F., Eden, C., & Finn, B. (2004). Visible thinking: Unlocking causal mapping for practical business results. Wiley.
  3. Cañibano, L., & Sánchez, M. P. (2009). Intangibles in universities: Current challenges for measuring and reporting. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 13(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/14013380910968648
  4. Cave, M., Hanney, S., Henkel, M., & Kogan, M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education. The challenge of the quality movement. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  5. Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2007). Multiple perspectives of performance measures. European Management Journal, 25(4), 266-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.06.001
  6. Choi, S. B., & Park, H. Y. (2022). The impact of performance appraisal systems on institutional effectiveness in South Korean universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(3), 302-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2021.1961809
  7. Conway, T., Mackay, S., & Yorke, D. (1994). Strategic planning in higher education: Who are the customers? International Journal of Educational Management, 8(6), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513549410069202
  8. Dasanayaka, C. H., Abeykoon, C., Ranaweera, R. A. A. S., & Koswatte, I. (2021). The impact of the performance appraisal process on job satisfaction of the academic staff in higher educational institutions. Education Sciences, 11(10), 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100623
  9. ERIA. (2023). Performance appraisal systems in higher education: An exploration of Christian institutions. ERIC.
  10. Flaniken, F. W. (2009). Performance appraisal systems in higher education: An exploration of Christian institutions. ProQuest LLC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED515732
  11. Karolyi, G. A., & Tilly, R. S. (2019). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in performance appraisal systems. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(4), 567-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2019-0034
  12. Lee, J. Y., & Moon, H. S. (2021). Challenges in implementing performance appraisal systems in higher education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(2), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09680-2
  13. Ogunlana, S. O., & Ogunlana, I. A. (2020). The role of performance appraisal systems in enhancing job satisfaction in Nigerian universities. Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20200801.16