Main Article Content

Abstract

The paper set out to describe what CUG students considered as the most desirable (best) attributes or characteristics of a good lecturer. The cross-sectional descriptive survey was designed along a quantitative paradigm. Data gathering was done through a questionnaire containing 44 items placed on a Likert-type scale and administered to 154 final-year students of CUG across faculties in the 2021/2022 academic year. Only 4 respondents did not return their responses thereby reducing the respondents to 150. The study revealed that lecturers who covered the syllabus or course outlines; made the subject intellectually exciting inter alia as the most desirable. Students, however, detest or frown on and even hate lecturers who accept gifts from them; give students undeserved grades among others. The paper, therefore, recommends that the management of universities continue to use students’ evaluation reports on lecturers as an essential basis for promoting lecturers. This would compel the academic staff to teach, research, and publish and not research and publish but fail to teach as it is common today in most tertiary institutions. It would thus, become a factor in the quality control of teaching. 

Keywords

Good lecturers qualities student’s perspective

Article Details

How to Cite
Nanyele, S., & Nokoe, K. S. (2023). Qualities of a Good Lecturer: Students’ Perspectives. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.53075/Ijmsirq/64464646

References

  1. Chen, V., Sandford, A., LaGrone, M., Charbonneau, K., Kong, J., & Ragavaloo, S. (2022). An exploration of instructors’ and students’ perspectives on remote delivery of courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53 (3), 512–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13205
  2. Gonzalez, R., Sørum, H., & Raaen, K. (2022). Emergency Digital Teaching during the COVID-19 Lockdown: Students’ Perspectives. Education Sciences, 12 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030152
  3. Hagenauer, G., Muehlbacher, F. & Ivanova, M. (2022). “It’s where learning and teaching begins ‒ is this relationship” — insights on the teacher-student relationship at university from the teachers’ perspective. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00867-z
  4. Hailikari, T., Virtanen, V., Vesalainen, M., & Postareff, L. (2022). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23 (3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160
  5. Hidayat, C., Rohyana, A., & Lengkana, A. S. (2022). Students’ Perceptions toward Practical Online Learning in Physical Education: A Case Study. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 6(2), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v6i2.21658
  6. Iqbal, S. A. Ashiq, M., Rehman, S. U., Rashid, S., & Tayyab, N. (2022). Students’ Perceptions and Experiences of Online Education in Pakistani Universities and Higher Education Institutes during COVID-19. Education Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030166
  7. Kumar, R., & Sharma, M. (n.d.). Representation of the Social Issues in Newly Independent India: A Study of Mohan Rakesh’s Adhe Adhure.
  8. Martín, P. A. (2019). Student perceptions of a good university lecturer. Educacao e Pesquisa, 45. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634201945196029
  9. Nushi, M., Momeni, A. & Roshanbin, M. (2022). Characteristics of an Effective University Professor From Students’ Perspective: Are the Qualities Changing? Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.842640.
  10. Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Ž. Valantinaitė, I., & Asakavičiūtė, V. (2022). ‘Should I Turn On My Video Camera?’ The Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Video Cameras in Synchronous Distant Learning. Electronics, 11 (5). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050813
  11. Tatipang, D. P., Manuas, M. J., Wuntu, C. N., Rorintulus, O. A. & Lengkoan, F. (2022). EFL Students’ Perceptions of the Effective English Teacher Characteristics. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 10 (1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v10i1.4
  12. Thornberg, R., Forsberg, C., Hammar Chiriac, E., & Bjereld, Y. (2022). Teacher–Student Relationship Quality and Student Engagement: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864772