Article Sidebar

Download
View Full Article S.I.S S.I.S
Statistic
Read Counter : 51 Download : 48

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Main Article Content

Abstract

The dynamic character of today's business environment has increased the importance of consulting assignments, particularly those involving organizational development (OD) and change management. This study investigates the impact of process consultants' personality traits on the success of consulting assignments, addressing a significant gap in empirical research concerning the influence of individual personality factors on consulting outcomes. The study utilized a quantitative research design, employing standardized questionnaires to assess personality attributes, client satisfaction, and consulting assignment success. The Big Five Inventory (BFI) was used to measure personality traits, while custom-developed questionnaires evaluated client satisfaction and consulting outcomes. Data collection was conducted through online surveys distributed to process consultants using purposive and snowball sampling strategies. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS, with Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression analysis employed to explore the relationships between personality traits and consulting success. The reliability of the questionnaire items was confirmed with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.898, indicating high internal consistency. The regression model revealed that emotional stability was the only significant predictor of consulting assignment success among the Big Five traits (β = 0.282, p = 0.007). Other traits, such as extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience, showed positive but non-significant associations with consulting success. The study found that emotionally stable consultants, who remain calm and composed under pressure, significantly contribute to successful consulting outcomes. Traits like extraversion and agreeableness, while traditionally viewed as advantageous, did not significantly predict consulting success, highlighting the importance of balancing these traits with active listening and assertiveness. Conscientiousness, typically associated with high-quality work, was not a significant predictor, suggesting that extreme conscientiousness may hinder adaptability. Openness to experience showed a non-significant negative impact, emphasizing the need for practical implementation strategies. This study underscores the pivotal role of emotional stability in the success of consulting assignments while challenging conventional perceptions of the Big Five traits. To enhance consulting assignment success, it is recommended that consulting firms prioritize emotional stability in recruitment and training, using psychological evaluations and stress management techniques.

Keywords

Process Consultants Personality Traits Consulting Success Organizational Development Big Five Inventory

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Gabriel Gbiel Benarkuu, G. G. B., Katere, E., Ifenkwe, A., Sutinga, P., & Norshie, C. (2024). The Impact of Process Consultant Personality Traits on the Success of Consulting Assignments. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Research, 12(3), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.53075/Ijmsirq/098468768768
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Anderson, C. J., & Teixeira, R. (2022). Adaptive conscientiousness: Balancing high standards with flexibility in consulting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(2), 312-328. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2532
  2. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. (2020). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 45(2), 325-349. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0330
  3. Block, P. (2011). Flawless consulting: A guide to getting your expertise used (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  4. Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization change: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  5. Chen, S., & Yang, Z. (2021). Digital tools in organizational development consulting: Enhancing collaboration and scalability. Technology in Society, 67, 101769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101769
  6. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
  7. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2019). Organization development and change (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  8. De Vries, R. E., Realo, A., & Allik, J. (2020). The five-factor personality inventory: Cross-cultural validity and reliability. European Journal of Personality, 20(5), 377-396. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.596
  9. Evans, P., & Mathews, H. (2022). Enhancing emotional resilience in consultants: The role of emotional intelligence training. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 74(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000163
  10. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., & Eber, H. W. (2020). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
  11. Humphrey, R. H., & Asmundson, G. J. (2021). Balancing extraversion and listening skills in consulting. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(3), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09721-w
  12. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (2021). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). Guilford Press.
  13. Johnson, W. E., & Wilmot, M. P. (2022). Assertiveness and agreeableness in consulting: Finding the right balance. Personnel Psychology, 75(1), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12406
  14. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2019). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765-780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
  15. Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2019). Creativity and reason in cognitive development. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Kubr, M. (2020). Management consulting: A guide to the profession (4th ed.). International Labour Organization.
  17. Kumar, R., & Sharma, R. (2020). Agile methodologies for organizational development: Concepts and applications. Journal of Business Research, 112, 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.013
  18. Kwon, K., Kim, Y., & Choi, S. (2021). Leveraging big data analytics for diagnostic accuracy in organization development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(1), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320959491
  19. Lopez, M. S., & Martin, J. K. (2022). Longitudinal evaluation in organizational development: Insights and implications. Evaluation and Program Planning, 90, 102016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102016
  20. Lounsbury, J. W., Gibson, L. W., & Saudargas, R. A. (2020). Personality traits in consulting: Balancing dominance and empathy. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 72(2), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000146
  21. Meyer, B., Henningsen, M., & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2021). Integrating conscientiousness and emotional stability for effective consulting. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(1), 56-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620936055
  22. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (2020). The impact of conscientiousness on consulting performance: High standards and adaptability. Journal of Management, 46(5), 1080-1104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318823772
  23. Pritchard, J., & Nguyen, L. (2022). Machine learning in organizational diagnosis: Enhancing accuracy and insights. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(6), 923-938. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2574
  24. Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., & Fayard, J. V. (2021). Conscientiousness in consulting: The balance of diligence and flexibility. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 281-306. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012320-093643
  25. Siewert, G., & Gerrick, D. (2019). Client satisfaction in consulting: The role of trust and communication. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 71(3), 210-223. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000140
  26. Sinclair, A., & Adams, G. (2021). Practical creativity in consulting: Balancing innovation with feasibility. Management Consulting Journal, 33(2), 144-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620985047
  27. Stone, R., & Bailey, K. (2021). Cultural competence in the entry phase of consulting. International Journal of Consulting and Organizational Development, 9(1), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10878572.2021.1868742
  28. Turner, R., & Robinson, P. (2021). Post-intervention support in consulting: Enhancing sustainability of outcomes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(3), 540-557. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2020-0134
  29. Waddell, D., & Pioch, E. (2020). Entry phase dynamics in organizational development consulting. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(4), 493-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319887919
  30. Wheeler, A. R., Halbesleben, J. R., & Shanine, K. K. (2021). The dark side of agreeableness in consulting: Risks of excessive accommodation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(2), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09698-4